Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mantri, Archana
- Augmented Reality as Teaching Aid: Making Chemistry Interactive
Abstract Views :158 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Neha Tuli
1,
Archana Mantri
1
Affiliations
1 CrEiLa, CURIN, Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
1 CrEiLa, CURIN, Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No Spl Iss (2015), Pagination: 188-191Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) is a combination of real world and digital data. It facilitates and enhances user experience of interaction with physical world by imposing virtual images on real ones. The idea presented in this paper is to show how AR can be used to enhance the learning experience of students in chemistry lab. The Augmented Reality Chemistry application presented here is a teaching aid supplementing the work of teacher in the chemistry lab. It proposes to make chemistry easy and interactive, while warning the students of any harmful efects/reactions by wrong use of chemicals in the laboratory.Keywords
Marker-Based Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Speech Recognition.
- Innovation Management Process in Young Academic Institutes
Abstract Views :164 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chitkara University Research & Innovation Network, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
1 Chitkara University Research & Innovation Network, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No Spl Iss (2015), Pagination: 252-256Abstract
Technological innovations from most young universities and academic institutes generally emerge out of chaos. Thus, there is usually no support system put in place to support and manage this chaos. This is also largely due to the objectives of young academic institutions which are defined out of their mission to focus on academic excellence and placement rather than to nurture innovations that promise long term benefits. While there have been many social science research methodology based studies on this subject under the broad umbrella of "Innovation and Technology Management", there is usually an absence of a well defined process to help academic institutions to manage their intellectual property better. A clearly articulated method for translation of ideas into technological innovation will certainly help young academic institutes to inculcate research in students and teachers and would help identify the best commercial application of technological innovations.
In this paper we identify the need, propose and debate features of an innovation management process, based on cloud based technologies, particularly suitable for young academic institutes, to promote and support innovation in students and faculty.
Keywords
Innovation Management, Cloud Based Technology.- Interactive Faculty Display:Giving AR Experience
Abstract Views :179 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Neha Tuli
1,
Archana Mantri
2
Affiliations
1 CSE, Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
2 Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
1 CSE, Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
2 Chitkara University, Rajpura, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No 3 (2016), Pagination: 61-66Abstract
Augmented Reality is the fusion of Real and Virtual Worlds enhancing the physical information by exact super-imposition of Computer generated content on it. This paper presents our AR application developed with AURASMAAR software. We briefly describe the project named as Faculty Display as an aid to students or visitors or other college faculty to know about/track the faculty of the college. Augmented reality techniques have been of great use in education [1], engineering [2] and entertainment [3]. We have designed it for our college, but the same can be designed in another way to be used in other educational institutes, schools, government offices, or any of the private offices.Keywords
Marker-Based Augmented Reality, Aurasma, Image Acquisition, Interaction Techniques, Layar, ARToolkit.- Resolving Network Issues Using Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
Abstract Views :217 |
PDF Views:114
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 34, No SP ICTIEE (2021), Pagination: 464-467Abstract
Networking is a critical and essential commodity in today's digital world, as it establishes communication between people at remote locations. Routers, switches, cables, etc. are the essential devices of any network. Network technicians use these devices to set up the network at homes, offices and public places. In a situation of any network issue, the end-user is dependent upon the network service provider to resolve the issue as the end-user has not sufficient knowledge about the network devices. However, with the help of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) technology, end-user can be provided with the basic training or knowledge to operate the network devices. In this paper, an AR or VR based learning environment is proposed, for providing the knowledge about different network devices and their connections. While this elementary knowledge will add to the awareness of the enduser about networking, it would also enable reducing the cost and time of the end-user and network technicians.Keywords
Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Networking, Data Transmission, Network Technicians, Routers, Switch.Full Text
- Augmented Reality in Educational Environments: A Systematic Review
Abstract Views :110 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, IN
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, IN
3 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, IN
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, IN
3 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 8-19Abstract
This study focuses on the emerging technologies used in Augmented Reality (AR) and their role in the field of education. With this aim, 70 articles gathered from Scopus, Science Direct, Springer, Taylor Francis, and Web of science databases were examined. Analysis showed that the number of AR articles in educational environments have gradually increased over the years. AR is being most commonly used in science education (biology, physics and chemistry). The literature also highlights various advantages of AR when used in learning environments. It has been understood that the AR is an imminent learning tool and is lately gaining recognition and acceptance in the educational field. While marker-based AR was the key in most of the articles, it was implemented using mobile devices. The literature revealed that most articles examined their results using Quantitative methods. Our article emphasizes on the impact of AR in education, current technologies and its future scope. This paper also provides detailed analysis of the use of AR in engineering education highlighting that the most of the articles highlighted the use of marker-based AR, used non-probability sampling strategy and applied mixed method for analysis. The findings of this study would help other researchers to identify potential direction for future research.Keywords
Augmented Reality, Education, Interactive Learning Environment, Technologies of Augmented Reality, Augmented Reality Integration.References
- Borrero, A., & Andu´jar Ma´rquez, J. (2012). A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality. Journal of science education and technology, 540-557.
- Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., & Meneses-Fernández, M. (2012). Adaptation of Electrical Laboratory Systems through Augmented. Eurographics, 3-8.
- Akçayır, & Akcayir. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
- Akçayır, Akcayir, Pektaş, & Ocak. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.
- Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.
- Bressler, D., & Bodzin, A. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517.
- Bronack, S. (2011). The Role of Immersive Media in Online Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 113-117.
- Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2 013 ). A psycho logi cal p erspective o n augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68(2013), 536-544.
- Carlson, K., & Gagnon, D. (2016). Augmented Reality Integrated Simulation. Clinical simulation in nursing, 12(4), 123-127.
- Carrera, C. C., & Asensio, L. A. (2016). Landscape interpretation with augmented reality and maps to improve spatial orientation skil. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 119-133.
- Chen, C.-p., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847.
- Chen, Y.-C., Chi, H.-L., & Hung, W.-H. (2011). Use of Tangible and Augmented Reality. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 267-276.
- Cheng, K.-H. (2017). Exploring Parents’ Conceptions of Augmented Reality earning and Approaches to Learning by Augmented Reality With Their Children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(6), 820-843.
- Chiang, T., Yang, S., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities . Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
- Churchill, & Wang. (2014). Teacher’s use of iPads in higher education. Educational Media International, 51(3), 214-225.
- Cohen, Manion, & Morrison. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
- Cook, J. (2010). Mobile phones as mediating tools within augmented contexts for development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(3), 1-12.
- Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research: Plnning, Conducting , and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education India.
- de Ravé, E., Jiménez-Hornero, F., & Taguas-Ruiz, J. (2016). DiedricAR: a mobile augmented reality system designed for the ubiquitous descriptive geometry learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 9647-9663.
- Di Serio, Ibáñez, & Kloos. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
- Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 8(1), 7-22.
- Echeverría, A., Améstica, M., & Kloos, C. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative gamesin the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1170-1177.
- Emma Liu, P.-H., & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented‐reality‐based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1-E4.
- Enyedy, Danish, Delacruz, & Kumar. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 347-378.
- Estapa A.& Nadolny L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM education, 16(3), 40-48.
- Ferrer-Torregrosa, J, J. T. Jimenez, M. & Garcia, S. (2014). ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119-24.
- FitzGerald, E. Ferguson R. Adams, A. Gaved, M. Mor, Y. & Thomas R. (2013). Augmented reality and mobile learning: the state of the art. International Journal of Mobile and blended learning, 5(4), 43-58.
- Furió, González-Gancedo, Juan, Segu, & Costa. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers & Education, 64, 24-41.
- Gavish, Gutiérrez, Webel, Rodriguez, Peveri, Bockholt, & Tecchia. (2015). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778-798.
- Han Jo So & Hyun. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 455-474.
- Hsiao, Chen, & Huan. (2012). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(4), 331-349.
- Hsu, T.-C. (2017). Learning English with Augmented Reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.
- Huang, Y. Li H. & Fong R. (2016). Using augmented reality in early art education: A case study in Hong Kong kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care. Early Child Development and Care, 186(6), 879-894.
- Ibáñez, Di Serio, Villarán, & Kloos. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
- Ibáñez, M. B., Serio, Á. D., Villaran, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact o n flow student experien ce an d educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
- Ibrahim, A., Huynh, B., Downey, J., Hollerer, T., Chun, D., & O'donovan, J. (2018). ARbis Pictus: A Study of Vocabulary Learning with Augmented Reality. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 24(11), 2867-2874.
- Johnson, L., Becker, A., S., Estrada, V., & Freeman. (2014). NMC Horizon Report. The New Media Consortium.
- Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2002). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. A C M SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications, (pp. 37-41).
- Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). Making it real: exploring the potential of Augmented Reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.
- Klopfer, E. (2008). Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games. MIT press.
- Klopfer, E., & Sheldon, J. (2010). Augmenting your own reality: Student authoring of science‐based augmented reality games. New directions for youth development, 128, 85-94.
- Kucuk, Kapakin, & Goktas. (2016). Learning Anatomy via Mobile Augmented Reality: Effects on Achievement and Cognitive Load. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(5), 411-421.
- Lee, K. (2012). Augmented Reality in Education and Training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21.
- Lin, Chen, & Chang. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799-810.
- Lin Duh Li Wang, & Tsai. (2013). An investigation of learners collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321.
- Lu S.-J. & Ying-Chieh Liu. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.
- Luckin R. & Fraser D. S. (2011). Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(5), 510-524.
- Martín Gutiérrez J. & Meneses Fernández M. (201 4). Applying Augmented Reality in Engineering Education to Improve Academic Performance & Student Motivation. The International journal of engineering education, 625-635.
- Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P. Benesova, W., Meneses, M. & Mora C. (2015). Augmented Reality to Promote Collaborative and Autonomous Learning in Higher Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752-761.
- Martín-Gutiérrez, J. Saorín J. L. Contero M. Alcañi, M. Pérez-López D. C. & Ortega M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
- Mateus, A., Cardoso, T., Coimbra, T., & MMath. (2015). Augmented Reality: An Enhancer forHigher Education Students in Math's Learning? Procedia Computer Science, 67, 332-339.
- Muñoz-Cristóbal, Asensio-Pérez, Jorrín-Abellán, & Dimitriadis. (2014). Deploying learning designs across physical and web spaces: Making pervasive learning affordable for teachers. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 14, 31-46.
- Omar, M. & Ali D. (2018). Enhancing students’ mental rotation skills and 3-dimensional development skills using augmented reality learning environment. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 1053-1067.
- Omar, M. Farzeeha Ali D. & Jambari, H. (2019). Effects of Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) towards Students’ Visualization Skills when Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 106-119.
- Omar M. Farzeeha Ali D. & Mokhtar M. (2018). The Use of Augmented Reality Learning Environment in Enhancing Students’ Mental Rotation Skills and 3-Dimensional Development Skills. Advanced Science Letters, 3705-3708.
- Ozdemir M. (2017). Experimental Studies on Learning with Augmented Reality Technology: A Systematic Review. Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(2), 609-632.
- Ozdemir M. Sahin C. Arcagok S. & Demir M. K. (2018). The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in the Learning Process: A Meta-Analysis Study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 74, 165-186.
- Pei-Chi H. Szu-Ming Chung, & Yi-Hua Lin. (2012). Influences on children's visual cognition capabilities through playing intelligent matrix’developed by the augmented virtual reality technology. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 6(1-2), 160-171.
- Radu I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543.
- Reyes-Aviles F. & Aviles-Cruz C. (2018). Handheld augmented reality system for resistive electric circuits understanding for undergraduate students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 602-616.
- Schmalstieg D. & Wagner D. (2007). Experiences with handheld augmented reality. Proceedings of 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2007. ISMAR 2007. Nara, Japan: IEEE.
- Serio Á. D. Ibanez M. B. & Kloos C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
- Setia M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 5: Sampling strategies. Indian journal of dermatology, 505.
- Shirazi A. & H. Behzadan A. (2015). Design and assessment of a mobile augmented reality-based information delivery tool for construction and civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141.
- Shirazi A. & Behzadan A. (2015). Content Delivery Using Augmented Reality to Enhance Students' Performance in a Building Design and Assembly Project. Advances in Engineering Education, 3.
- Singh G. Mantri A. & Dutta R. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the augmented reality learning environment on electronics laboratory skills of engineering students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 1361-1375.
- Solak E. & Cakir R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 50-72.
- Squire K.(2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The journal of the learning sciences, 16(3), 371-413.
- Squire K. D. (2010). From information to experience: Place-based augmented reality games as a model for learning in a globally networked society. Teachers College Record, 112(10), 2565-2602.
- Sung Y.-T. Chang K-E. & Liu T.-C. (2014). The Effects of Integrating Mobile Devices with Teaching and Learning on Students’ Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
- Tang S.-L. Kwoh C-K. Teo M.-Y. Sing N.W. & Ling K.-V. (1998). Augmented reality systems for medical applications. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine (pp. 49-58). IEEE.
- Tanner,Karas & Schofield .(2014). Augmentinga childrens reality using educational tablet technology. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innovations Pract, 71(8), 45-54.
- Tesolin A. & Tsinakos A. (2018). Opening real doors: Strategies for using mobile augmented reality to create inclusive distance education for learners with different-abilities. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning: A International Handbook (pp. 59-80). Singapore: Springer.
- Thornton Ernst & Clark. (2012). Augmented reality as a visual and spatial learning tool in technology education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 18-21.
- Tomi A. B. & Rambli D. R. (2013). An Interactive Mobile Augmented Reality Magical Playbook: Learning Number With The Thirsty Crow. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 123-130.
- Turan Z. Meral E. & Sahin I. F. (2018). The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education: achievements, cognitive loads and views of university students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1-15.
- Vlahakis V. Ioannidis N. Karigiannis J. Tsotros M. & Gounaris M.(2002). Archeoguide: an augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (pp. 52-60). IEEE.
- Wang Duh Li Lin & Tsai. (2014). An Investigation of University Students Collaborative Inquiry Learning Behaviors in an Augmented Reality Simulation and a Traditional Simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 682-691.
- Webster A. Feiner S. MacIntyre B. Massie W. & Krueger T. (1996). Augmented Reality in Architectural Construction, Inspection, and Renovation. Proc. ASCE Third Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, 1, p. 996.
- Yilmaz & R.M. (2016). Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(4), 240-248.
- Yimaz R. M. (2018). Augmented Reality Trends in Education between 2016 and 2017 Years. In State of the Art Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Knowhow (pp. 81-96). IntechOpen.
- Yoon S. Elinich K. Wang J. Steinmeier C. & Tucker S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519-541.
- Zhang J. Sung Y. Hou H. & Chang K. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observati on instruction . Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
- Using Concept Inventory for Assessing Conceptual Knowledge in the Signals and Systems Course
Abstract Views :46 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Psychology, St. Mary MacKillop College, ACT, AU
1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, IN
2 Department of Psychology, St. Mary MacKillop College, ACT, AU
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No 1 (2023), Pagination: 41-50Abstract
The engineering schools usually target problem-solving skills in students instead of conceptual development, which is an essential skill for transformation from novice to professional engineer as per the program objective. Improving a student's conceptual knowledge can help students understand a problem better and develop a better solution. Conceptual understanding also assists students in identifying gaps in their problem-solving techniques. This paper attempts to administer a Signal and System Concept Inventory (SSCI) to test the conceptual knowledge of core concepts of signals and systems course and then identify the correlation of post-test scores with the student's performance in the end-term exam. The result shows that the students who scored above 80% in concept inventory also performed outstanding in the end-term examination. The result also indicates that most of the students able solve questions on background mathematics and pole- zero plots but struggled with convolution and Fourier analysis.Keywords
concept inventory, conceptual understanding, assessment, engineering educationReferences
- Boles, W., Goncher, A., & Jayalath, D. (2015). Uncovering misconceptions through text analysis. 6th Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Translating Research into Practice, REES 2015, July, 13–15.
- Fayyaz, F. (2014). A qualitative study of problematic reasoning’s of undergraduate electrical engineering students in Continuous Time Signals and Systems courses. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_disserta tions.
- Padgett, W. T., Yoder, M. A., & Forbes, S. A. (2011). Extending the usefulness of the Signals and Systems Concept Inventory (SSCI). 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting, DSP/ SPE 2011 Proceedings, 204-209. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSP-SPE.2011.5739212
- Rahmawati, Rustaman, N. Y., Hamidah, I., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). The development and validation of conceptual knowledge test to evaluate conceptual knowledge of physics prospective teachers on electricity and magnetism topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 483-490. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13490
- Sands, D., Parker, M., Hedgeland, H., Jordan, S., & Galloway, R. (2018). Using concept inventories to measure understanding. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3 (1 ) , 173 – 182 . https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.143354 6
- Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00979.x
- Taraban, R., Anderson, E. E., DeFinis, A., Brown, A. G., Weigold, A., & Sharma, M. P. (2007). First steps in understanding engineering students growth of conceptual and procedural knowledge in an interactive learning context. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00915.x
- Taraban, R., DeFinis, A., Brown, A. G., Anderson, E. E., & Sharma, M. P. (2007). A paradigm for assessing conceptual and procedural knowledge in engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2007.tb00943.x
- Wage, K. E., Buck, J. R., Welch, T. B., & Wright, C. H. G. (2002). Testing and validation of the signals and systems concept inventory. Proceedings of 2002 IEEE 10th Digital Signal Processing Workshop, DSP 2002 and 2nd Signal Processing Education Workshop, SPE 2002, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSPWS.2002.1231094
- Wage, Kathleen E., Buck, J. R., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2006). Analyzing misconceptions using the signals and systems concept inventory and student interviews. 2006 IEEE 12th Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 4th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSPWS.2006.265451
- Wage, Kathleen E., Buck, J. R., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Nelson, J. K. (2011). Signals and systems assessment: Comparison of responses to multiple choice conceptual questions and open-ended final exam problems. 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting, DSP/SPE 2011 - Proceedings, 198 – 203. https:// doi. org/ 10 . 1109 / DSP- SPE.2011.5739211
- Wage, Kathleen E., Buck, J. R., Wright, C. C. H. G., & Welch, T. B. (2005). The signals and systems concept inventory. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(3), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2005.849746v